Your Webcomic Review is Bad and You Should Feel Bad
Posted by Sean C on Oct 10th, 2007
There are numerous webcomic review blogs on the internet, and most of them are terrible. They reward low-quality comics, and many authors seek out support and friendship rather than strive for honest criticism. However, I’ve come across a blog entitled Your Webcomic is Bad and You Should Feel Bad, by one John Solomon, which takes the opposite approach.
And I hate it.
Solomon is anti-webcomics; he’s very up front about that, and his goal is to highlight terrible webcomics in the hopes that not only will people stop reading these strips, but that the creators themselves will stop making them. I don’t agree with that goal. Webcomics are a hobbyist’s medium, and Solomon expects nothing but perfection and professionalism from webcomic creators. Too bad he can’t apply those rules to his own writings.
You see, Solomon is a terrible writer. His prose is rife with scores of curse words, which so overwhelms each article that he negates the point of his review. His critiques are lost in a haze of obscenity, which kills any credibility he may have had. Solomon also rambles on about various problems he sees with each comic, revisiting them throughout each article, and with all those swears, it’s boring to read through it all. It’s such poor writing that it makes a person actually feel like they’ve lost a bit of their intellect by the time they’ve finished reading. That’s not journalism, nor is it even clever – it’s literary syphilis.
His other major problem is that he’s a self-righteous hypocrite who can’t take any criticism himself. He has stated that he doesn’t write for any audience – a great goal for any writer – and doesn’t care whether or not people enjoy or dislike his reviews. They’re really just for him, which doesn’t exactly explain why he now has a stable of contributors helping him. The lone wolf has a staff because he apparently couldn’t come up with one review a week, which until recently was his goal. Believe me, that’s a lie, and now that he’s got an audience, he’s full of himself and into the attention. Why would he claim his work is not really for anyone but him, and then put it on the net for the entire planet to see? He plays the part of a “serious” critic, but when someone criticizes him, he belittles and ridicules them in a childish manner. One of his targets even came into his comments section, and politely admitted that Solomon was right, and Solomon told him to get “dick cancer”. Why? He thought it was funny. That says so much about John Solomon right there, doesn’t it? No class and a piss-poor sense of humor. Let’s face it – when a guy has to spend a sizable chunk of each article writing personal attacks against the creators, one really shouldn’t expect that much to begin with. It’s also cute when he uses guest strips in his examples of how the creators had done such a terrible job.
He also enjoys playing the role of a pariah. There are multiple posts explaining how he’s such a persecuted fella. He’s claimed to have received death threats from cartoonists and their fans; this I can believe – there’s just so many crazies out there. However, he wants to be seen as infallible. His ego is so fragile that he actively berates those in his comments section that attack him, and he does this while pretending that it doesn’t bother him. He claims that one of the biggest complaints against him is people asking, “Where’s your webcomic”? Well, folks, it looks like Solomon is responsible for the reprehensibly bad parody webcomic Dominic Durgan, which takes Mookie’s already bad strips and makes them infinitely worse. With more pointless cursing and the dick-and-fart humor of a twelve year old, Solomon proves once again what a clever boy he really is. He’s told creators that once their work is online, then it’s there for the world, and it’s practically a crime when that material is pitifully amateur. If only Solomon could recognize the irony in his statement…
When I first started reading Your Webcomic is Bad and You Should Feel Bad, I thought Solomon was some kind of character – a crotchety, cranky, “fan” who was so over the top that the whole thing was a joke. As time went on, it became apparent that he wasn’t, and he is really like that. Solomon is also Fuego Fish from the Something Awful forums, and his posting style there is pretty much the same; however, he actually offers some thoughtful and useful insights on those forums. It’s a shame that didn’t carry over. The SA crowd can be brutal as all hell, but a lot of people there know what they’re talking about when it comes to webcomics. Honestly, Solomon could have still pointed out the flaws and highlight the out of control egos that litter the medium if he simply baited creators famous for that into flame-fests; an approach like that would not only prove a point, it would likely be far more entertaining. You could get ten years of material off Bobby Crosby alone.
I don’t knock Solomon for his intentions; I just can’t stand his execution. He doesn’t critique – he whines incessantly like a spoiled child. To do that with webcomics of all things…it makes him worse than a Star Trek fan who actually knows Klingon. It’s that pathetically picky. How miserable does a person have to be to intentionally troll the net for bad webcomics to berate? If you come across a webcomic you know sucks, you move on. Sometimes, it may take time to realize it sucks. I know many people who were former Ctrl-Alt-Del and Megatokyo readers; they woke recognized those crappy comics for what they were. I don’t like Solomon’s style of review; it contributes nothing. I don’t like ass-kissing critics, either. As for me, all I try to do is highlight lesser-known good comics or new comics that show potential that the average reader might not encounter during their web-surfing.
Since this will likely find its way back to Solomon – that’s the nature of the net, then I advise Solomon to take his own advice and quit. Since he’s such a hypocrite, I doubt that will happen. He’s not funny. He’s not clever. He can’t even write a decent review. His idea of parody and humor in general is so juvenile that only grade-schoolers would laugh. John – you suck at what you do. Deal with it.
Note: This is an opinion piece and does not reflect the views of all the Way of the Geek staff.
If you liked that, try...
- Some Warm, Fresh Webcomic News – You Could Win Stuff!
- Frumph – A New Webcomics List
- Openings At Spiderforest
- minus. Ends
- Gear Review: PC Filter & Phone Pouch
Comments are currently closed.















I think you guys are missing the point. His site is not a “review site”. It’s a hall of shame for the worlds worst webcomics. The comments aren’t meant to be constructive. They are meant to be funny… and I think he succeeds in this (to an extent).
While I often find Solomon’s vitriol a little on the catty side, I have to say that whatever his style and however much of a “hater” he may be, he does valuable work. My respect for Solomon is based in the fact that, criticism of story structure or art aside, he unfailingly pings authors of webcomics for being sexist, racist and homophobic. As an ideological warrior, he never misses a trick, and I’ve found his attention to these details – especially when it comes to the two dimensional, boobylicious and downright regressive female characters some geekboy artists are wont to produce – pleasing, and frankly, I’ve waited a long time for some of these criticisms.
It’d be great if Solomon could tone down the passive agressive gay-bashing (see: Chasing Amy,) but he still has my vote for second funniest feminist.
I agree with everything in this article. Most people these days think that critics just need to hate everything and be profane about it to be good. Really, though, being a good critic requires you to really have a love for the general spirit of what you are reviewing. You can’t just say “This comic sucks because I hate comics”; that is completely asinine, backwards and unintelligent. I can only think of the recent Pixar Film “Ratatouille” in which the vampirically cruel food critic was revealed not to be a soulless monster but someone who demanded the best from the medium he loved. As Solomon clearly hates comics, he doesn’t have this going for him.
I also have to think of the recent crop of games videos, especially Zero Punctuation versus the Angry Video Game Nerd. The former’s success is not due solely to Croshaw’s adeptness at swearing, but his clever, dead-on writing which uses profanity only as a seasoning, and more importantly his love for gaming; he’s played games, designed games, sat through games good and bad and knows what to look for. The latter is just so much anger and tripe, because not only does the creator share Solomon’s opinion that swearing automatically makes you funny, but also the fact that he is unilaterally horrible at gaming (although this is hopefully hammed up)
In short, save the dick cancer for yourself, John
Doesn’t look like Solomon has updated since April.
Ding, dong, the witch is dead!
I never got into web comics because all of the popular ones are shitty, I just felt like I was one of the few people that felt this way. It introduced me to a ton of strips that are good via the comments, links, etc, and actually helped me improve my own work by taking note of what themes repeated in each review. That writing style is by and for a very specific audience type, and in that genre it’s fantastic. It really cheered my up scouring the archives and brought me a lot of entertainment, quotes, and things to tell friends who all found it funny enough, despite your obvious disdain for it.
Now, I always did think he took it a bit too seriously, but.. he’s good at what he did, your review was just as personal as his get, but not nearly as entertaining to me.
No, I think I will laugh, ‘bud’. Because this is still fail any way you put it.
Good lord, you are a whiny little bitch. Those were truly terrible comics, written by truly terrible people who deserved everything they got.
Why are you people still complaining about this post? It’s over a year old, let it go already. Life goes on, as does this site, but apparently some of us have problems getting over the smallest of humps. Comments for this post are now closed.