http://wayofthegeek.org/2007/03/adobe-photoshop-online-free/ Your One Stop Geek Shop Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:45:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://wayofthegeek.org/2007/03/adobe-photoshop-online-free/#comment-1083 Sean C Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:00:09 +0000 http://wayofthegeek.org/main_story/252_adobe-photoshop-online-free.html#comment-1083 I just hope it will be an upgrade from 5.5, which is the only version I have access to at home. I just hope it will be an upgrade from 5.5, which is the only version I have access to at home.

]]> http://wayofthegeek.org/2007/03/adobe-photoshop-online-free/#comment-1070 Shawn M. Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:13:45 +0000 http://wayofthegeek.org/main_story/252_adobe-photoshop-online-free.html#comment-1070 I wish I knew, but the article didn't go in-depth as to its features. It looks like the release date of this is still a long time off, so Adobe themselves probably haven't hammered out what this will offer. I wish I knew, but the article didn’t go in-depth as to its features. It looks like the release date of this is still a long time off, so Adobe themselves probably haven’t hammered out what this will offer.

]]> http://wayofthegeek.org/2007/03/adobe-photoshop-online-free/#comment-1069 Devin de Gruyl Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:06:21 +0000 http://wayofthegeek.org/main_story/252_adobe-photoshop-online-free.html#comment-1069 How "basic" are we talking here? Obviously it won't have everything the boxed version has, but (the real question is) will it have <i>enough</i> features to prevent users from seeking out established free solutions (like The GIMP or Paint.NET) that already implement enough Photoshop functionality to be considered viable alternatives in their own right? How “basic” are we talking here? Obviously it won’t have everything the boxed version has, but (the real question is) will it have enough features to prevent users from seeking out established free solutions (like The GIMP or Paint.NET) that already implement enough Photoshop functionality to be considered viable alternatives in their own right?

]]>